Synopsis of alleged crimes of John Brennan.

Synopsis of alleged Crimes of John Brennan In 2021 my intelligence source, one Mr. John Donovan,  distributed a letter to media outlets advising and cautioning of alleged crimes conducted by John O. Brennan while he had served under the Barrack Obama Administration.  Among the heinous crimes allegedly committed by the former Director CIA, were crimes that aimed to keep a duly elected US President, Donald J Trump, out of office.  Donovan's efforts of caution were largely ignored. In 2024 at CPAC DC in Maryland, this person (my intel source) approached me and my podcast booth.  This was my first encounter and or knowledge of Mr. Donovan and was the first I had heard of any allegations of criminal activity by the former head of the CIA (John Brennan).  Upon receiving the material and conducting a podcast, I made the material handed me my sole personal focus.  That being, to continue to distribute and inform media and America of the alleged crimes of John Brennan.  Those efforts have recently culminated in the release of the book: High Stakes Treason .   Link: here . What we find, out of the work that Mr. John Donovan and I are bringing forth, is that the alleged criminal scheme of Mr. Brennan stretches much further than the financial motives he seemingly hid from our Republic.  For example: recent testimony of Patrick Byrne (Overstock) states that Brennan was a partner in building a Data Center in Belgrade, Serbia that manipulated Dominion voter system servers that affected US Presidential elections in 2020.  We also see that the former Hollywood director, Rob Reiner, conducted an interview of Brennan and James Clapper in 2017 whom, all, were directly involved in the Russian collusion.  An effort to keep Donald Trump out of office in 2016.  And, again, we are seeing a connection between John Brennan and a CIA asset named Stefan Halper working with Cambridge University to mask or alter intelligence that affected or attempted to cloud US Presidential elections in 2016.  But the following will focus on the material found in High Stakes Treason which is that of the engineered CT Intel Info monopoly Mr. Brennan seemingly set-up to enrich himself.  This intelligence apparatus was created as a result of establishing the NCTC (National Counter-Terrorism Center) out of the post 9/11 George W. Bush Executive Order 13354 - while integrating it with the indispensable government contractor: The Analysis Corporation.  This all being done at the cost of allegedly allowing terror events and activities to unfold - that cost Americans and their allies, their lives. From this point forward I present to you the letter from Mr. Donovan that circulated to and largely ignored by, American media.  Note: Page breaks (not notated) come after the numerically listed footnotes. SOURCE  OPENING STATEMENT I am writing to you regarding criminal activity by John 0. Brennan, ex-Director CIA. I am a former FBI/SA (1988-2000) and worked FCI and Espionage matters in the National Security Division at Washington Field Office. I first became aware of Brennan's criminal activity in July 2011, but I only realized the financial aspects of his crimes in 2019. Brennan made a fortune while allowing innocent Americans to be killed or maimed in terrorist acts By hiding his proprietary ownership of stock in an indispensable government contractor in his company 401K account, Brennan was able to garner an increase in value from approximately $50,000 to at least $4.8 million, while he was National Security Advisor for Counterterrorism . (NSA/CT) and Director CIA. However, Brennan lied about the value of this 401k account on five separate Financial Disclosure forms to cover up his conflicts of interest. Brennan's actions amount to treason against the United States, but the most easily proven violations are financial in nature. I have evidence Brennan: • filed five False Official Statements while National Security Advisor for CT (NSA/CT) and Director CIA, [Title 18, Sect. 10011 • caused two other False Official Statements to be made, one by an Office of Government Ethics official and one by the White House Ethics Officer, [Title 18, Sect. 10011 and • committed eight years of Financial Conflict of Interest offenses. [Title 18, Sect. 208] As NSA/CT to the President, and Director CIA, it is reasonable to conclude Brennan's official decisions would materially affect the value of the indispensable government contractor and the price of the shares Brennan owned in the company. There is clear evidence that even partially successful terror attacks caused Congress to increase funding to counterterrorism efforts which was then passed to the indispensable government contractor and increased the value of Brennan's stock in this indispensable government contractor. I believe this blood money is why Brennan misused his government office to attack President Trump.You know the old saying "follow the money.11 I did, and the evidence of the above violations is all taken from US Government sources. The purpose of this letter is to share my findings with you. I too, am disgusted by the conduct of my former team - the FBI, but I can't "prove" the criminal acts I believe they committed. Brennan, on the other hand, is so stupid he left a paper trail that was pretty easy to follow once you knew where to look. I have reported these findings to the FBI, CIA, and the NSA, but the public does not know. Throwing around various charges of 'socialist', 'totalitarian', 'communist', etc. makes most people's eyes glaze over... But, show the public the crook did it for money is something the public understands easily. The following information is self-explanatory, but if you need to ask me about any of it, just contact me using the address information above. BEGIN LETTER  - SYNOPSIS I am writing to inform you of a serious case of Fraud against the Government by both John Owen Brennan, former Director CIA, and The Analysis Corporation (and its successor companies). My allegations are based on my personal experience, public information, and government records. I have identified four additional individuals with direct access to unclassified, non-public information who can provide corroborating testimony. Fraud Against the Government by way of Fraud in the Inducement: John Owen Brennan, along with unnamed co-conspirators, used his offices as: • Director of the CIA's Terrorist Threat Integration Center (TTIC), and as: • Director of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), and as: • CEO and President of The Analysis Corporation, Inc. (TAC), and as: • President's National Security Advisor for Counterterrorism (NSA/CT), and subsequently as: • Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (DCI), to; establish a Counterterrorism Intelligence Information-monopoly (CT Intel info-monopoly) of all counterterrorism intelligence available to the U.S. government. Brennan, and unknown co-conspirators, used this monopoly to withhold such information from appropriate U.S. Intelligence Agencies so as to enable certain terror attacks to succeed. The successful attacks resulted in the death and serious injury of both U.S. and allied nation citizens. Brennan's purpose in enabling a select few terror attacks to succeed was to induce the U.S. government to spend increasing amounts of money to prevent similar attacks in the future. Brennan personally benefited from the increase in spending because the increased funding significantly increased the value of his personal financial holdings in violation of federal Conflict of Interest Laws (18 USC sec. 208). Brennan's activity also violated laws regarding the Deprivation of Civil Rights under Color of Official Right (18 USC sec. 242); Fraud Against the Government by Way of Inducement (18 USC sec. 1031); and Treason by providing aid and comfort to the enemy (18 USC sec. 2381). By means of this Fraud-in-the-Inducement scheme (18 USC sec. 1031), Brennan, and unnamed co-conspirators, was able to convert his proprietary ownership of approximately 1,372 shares in common stock in The Analysis Corporation (TAC), valued at approximately $50,000 in 20091, into approximately 200,000 shares of successor company stock (NASDAQ: GTEC), valued at $2,100,000 in 2010. By April 2011, the value of Brennan's stock holding in GTEC increased to $4,850,000 following the acquisition of GTEC by Ares Management, who took the company private.2 Brennan hid this windfall from public view by knowingly concealing it in his company 401K account and knowingly misrepresenting the monetary value of his 401k accounts on his Financial Disclosure forms for 8 consecutive years. Brennan's last False Official Statement to conceal this fraud scheme was in May, 2017. _________________________________ 1 http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/Brennan.pdf 2 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edqar/data/1471038/000095012311032487/c15093sv8pos.htm The background of the Fraud. Brennan, and others unnamed, used the confusion of the reorganization of the U.S. Intelligence Community following the September 11, 2001 attacks, and their high ranking positions in the government, to establish a Counterterrorism Intelligence Information-monopoly of all counterterrorism intelligence available to the U.S. government (CT Intel info-monopoly). The establishment of this "CT Intel Info-monopoly" was carried out in a deliberate manner to ensure a small group of individuals could "front run" future terrorism incidents and thereby increase the share value of an indispensable government contractor - The Analysis Corporation (TAC), and its successor companies. Such a scheme would enrich the shareholders of TAC, but first TAC needed to be converted into a publically traded company to maximize the potential financial gains. The Analysis Corporation (TAC) was a classified contractor for the CIA and the Department of State since 1990.3 TAC designed and maintained the State Department's TIPOFF list, an early version of the terrorist watch list, using proprietary and copyrighted software. Another proprietary software program was TAC's trademarked computer program, FUZZY FINDER. Owning the proprietary software that made important national security programs of the U.S. Government possible is akin to owning the "double-click" patent/copyright. Almost every website in the world uses the "double-click" feature and each website has to pay the holder of the "double-click" patent/copyright a fee whenever a user "double-clicks" a link on a website. TAC has a similar legal authority in the Intelligence Community. FUZZY FINDER "...has been continuously operational within the government [since 1990] and has been a very effective tool for finding the names of suspected or known terrorists in various databases..."4 FUZZY FINDER was able to match various anglicized versions of names, originally written in non-English alphabets (Arabic, Cyrillic, etc.), with a particular individual traveler or visa holder, no matter which variant of the English spelling the individual used.5 TAC's intellectual property formed the foundation of any terrorist tracking effort by the U.S. Government. FUZZY FINDER and TAC's other proprietary programs established TAC as the indispensable government contractor following the 9-11 attacks. FUZZY FINDER figured prominently in identifying this complex and long running scheme to defraud the government. The U.S. Intelligence Community claimed, falsely, on numerous occasions, that its inability to decipher the names of two terrorists in various travel related databases was a partial cause of these terrorists' success in terrorizing American citizens. _________________________________ 3 https://engineeringevil.com/2013/02/10/intel-firm-paid-cia-nominee-well-as-he-left-for-white-house/ 4 https://www.chron.com/news/article/PRN-The-Analysis-Corporation-and-lnfoglide-1859462.php 5 For example, the Arabic name Mohammed can be spelled Muhammad, Mohammad, Muhammed, Mohamed, Mohamad, Muhamad, Muhamed, Mohamud, Mohummad, Mohummed, Mouhamed, Mohammed and Mouhamad in English - and TAC's proprietary program Fuzzy Finder enables the system to look through each variant to identify the traveller. The two terrorists were Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab6 7 and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, the Boston Marathon bomber. Both terrorists succeeded in terrorizing the American public while Brennan was either the President's NSA/CT, or the Director of the CIA. In either position, Brennan's official decisions could reasonably be believed to affect the value of TAC, the indispensable government contractor, for his personal financial benefit. The Establishment of the Monopoly: President George W. Bush directed the FBI, CIA, Homeland Security, and the Department of Defense to establish the Terrorist Threat Integration Center (TTIC) to merge and analyze all Terror threat information in a single location [emphasis added] during his January 28, 2003 State of the Union Address.8 Subsequently, TAC was bought by, and made a wholly owned subsidiary of, Sachs Freeman Associates, Inc. (SFA, Inc.}, a well-established government contracting company. On March 12, 2003 CIA Director George Tenet assigned his former Chief of Staff, John Owen Brennan, to become the first director of the TTIC.9 On May 1, 2003, the TTIC opened its doors. John 0. Brennan, Director, TTIC filled its ranks with approximately three dozen detailees from across the US Government (USG} and was mandated to integrate CT capabilities and missions across the government.10 Brennan was enabled to establish his "CT Intel Info-monopoly'' by executive order. Brennan himself stated, "... The idea behind TTIC was that we needed to have someplace in the government where all counterterrorism information would reside [emphasis added]. Eventually, information from all 26 classified and unclassified networks flowed into TTIC; [TTIC] wanted voyeuristic capability [into the activities and records of the entire Intelligence Community]. The good news and the bad news: [TTIC] had more access to more information than anywhere in the government [emphasis added}. .."11 12 On August 27, 2004, President George W. Bush converted TTIC into the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC} via executive order.13 14 The NCTC had two core missions: • to serve as the primary organization in the U.S. Government for analysis and integration of all terrorism intelligence, and • to conduct strategic operational planning (SOP} for counterterrorism activities integrating all elements of U.S. national power.15 ____________________________________ 6https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/FOIA/Report to the Director of National Intelligence on the Fort Hood and Northwest Flight 253 Incidents U.pdf, page 14 7https://www.dni.gov/files/documents/FOIA/Report to the Director of National Intelligence on the Fort Hood and Northwest Flight 253 Incidents U.pdf, page 6 8 https:/twww.dni.gov/index.php/nctc-who-we-are/history 9 https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/author/john-BRENNAN 10 https://www.dni.gov/index.php/nctc-who-we-are/history 11 http://web.mit.edu/SSP/seminars/wed archives06fall/BRENNAN .htm 12 https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC 0005618307.pdf 13 https://www.dni.gov/index.php/nctc-who-we-are/history 14 OIG Unclassified Report on Boston Marathon Bombings; https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2014/s1404.pdf 15 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John Scott Redd Brennan continued as the director of TTIC as it transitioned into the NCTC, and then Brennan was appointed interim Director NCTC on October 27, 2004. 16 17 18 Under Brennan's leadership the TTIC, and then the NCTC, "... [had] the responsibility to provide integrated assessments of the terrorist threat; for example, when there are Principals Committee meeting (sic) or Deputies Committee meetings or the president needs to be briefed on something about the terrorist threat, TTIC [and then the NCTC] represents the view from throughout the community ... that is sort of a unique responsibility that we have on behalf of those partner agencies [emphasis added]..."19 Brennan was able to establish the CT Intel Info-monopoly from the intake of the raw intelligence information all the way to the Office of the President of the United States. Brennan stated, "... [NCTC] is the mission manager on terrorism for the [entire Intelligence] community as far as the collection requirement system is concerned. We... play a lead role; we work with the other agencies and departments to determine the national intelligence priorities framework [emphasis added]... "20 In the above statements, Brennan clearly described how his new agency is the mission manager for collection requirements for the entire intelligence community (i.e. NCTC directs what information agencies, like the NSA, collects for CT purposes). To describe the depth of penetration the NCTC's CT Intel Info-monopoly had into FBI and CIA . internal records and information systems, Brennan provided the following observations: "... The FBI has the responsibility for working with local law enforcement as far as getting information that is relevant to the terrorist threat... The FBI puts all that information into its databases and information systems, and the [CT Intel Info-monopoly] has unfettered access to those FBI systems....1121 " ... Data does not have to be pushed to us by the FBI or other organizations. That's the great thing about [the CT Intel Info-monopoly], we don't have to rely on CIA or FBI or others to package up information and send it to us. We have full real-time visibility into their information systems and databases. So anything that's committed to an electron in the FBI system or the CIA system, we have real-time access to it [emphasis addedj ...1122 And "... we at [the CT Intel Info-monopoly] have full and unfettered access to [CIA Directorate of Operations (DO)] information systems, DO cable traffic and DO databases [emphasis addedJ ...1123 OHS analysts [in the CT Intel Info-monopoly] have visibility into the CIA and FBI databases and information systems, and if [our analysts] see anything that is of relevance to the Department of Homeland Security that has not yet been formally disseminated, we have mechanisms in place that allow that analysts (sic) to go back to CIA or the FBI and say, "you may not realize this, but this information is important. .. "24 ____________________________________ 16 https://www.cia.qov/library/readinqroom/docs/DOC 0005618307.pdf 17  https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/author/john-BRENNAN 18 https://www.cia.gov/library/readinqroom/docs/DOC 0005618307.pdf 19 https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/OOC 0005618307.pdf 20 https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC 0005618307. pdf 21 https://www.cia.gov/library/readinqroom/docs/OOC 0005618307. pdf 22 https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/DOC 0005618307.pdf 23 https://www.cia.gov/library/readinqroom/docs/DOC 0005618307.pdf 24 https://www.cia.gov/library/readinqroom/docs/DOC  0005618307.pdf The significance of the above two paragraphs: NCTC personnel can peruse the contents of FBI and CIA databases and electronic communications at will, in real time, with no oversight, but HAVE NO OBLIGAT/ON to reveal to either agency what NCTC personnel actually reviewed in either agency's files, or what importance the NCTC personnel attached to the information they found. NCTC can review initial information about a person in FBI and CIA file and communication systems without the direct oversight of either organization. NCTC can use this unprecedented access to "spot" a potential terrorist before either the FBI or the CIA are even able to assign an agent or analyst to review the information. These circumstances existed in both the Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab and the Tsarnaev incidents. This advanced notice can then allow a bad actor in the NCTC to pick and choose (classify and compartmentalize) which additional intelligence collected by the NSA on the potential terrorist that the NCTC will be allowed to filter down to the FBI Case Agent. By filtering out just enough key information to hamstring an FBI Guardian investigation, the bad actor at the NCTC can set up the potential terrorist to succeed, and for the FBI to be seen by the public to fail. For example, the Boston Marathon bomber-Tamerlan Tsarnaev, was first reported to the FBI as a potential terror threat by way of an initial message from a foreign intelligence service, the Rilissian FSB.25 The FSB informed the FBI they considered Tamerlan Tsamaev a terror threat b�sed on Tsarnaev's online activity, telephone conversations with his mother, and contact Tsarnaev had with two additional suspected terrorists.26 This initial FSB communication became available to the NCTC at the same time it arrived in FBI communication channels at FBIHQ; and before an investigative lead could be set in the FBl's Guardian system. With this initial information, an NCTC analyst could search all 26 Intelligence Community databases, sift through social media posts, and conduct a separate assessment on Tsarnaev before the investigative lead was even assigned to an FBI Agent. With their advance knowledge, the NCTC could then front run the FBI investigation by tasking the NSA to send Tsarnaev related information to the NCTC instead of the FBI preventing the FBI from having a chance to look at the information. The OIG's unclassified report contains a reference to the FBI LEGAT Moscow stating his opinion that [redacted agency abbreviation] would have recordings of Tsarnaev's international telephone conversations.27 Only one agency fits this description - the NSA, but the FBI Guardian investigation did not locate any such references28 which is why the FBI Guardian investigation erroneously concluded Tsarnaev was not a terror threat. The NCTC's intelligence tasking authority allows it to modify intelligence collection priorities vis-a-vis a person of interest so that only NCTC receives any additional information on that target from raw intelligence collectors (such as the NSA's PRISM & XKeyScore type programs). This is a perfect set up for a small group of individuals to front run a future terror attack for financial gain using the awesome reach and power of the U.S. Intelligence apparatus. ______________________________ 25 OIG Unclassified Report on Boston Marathon Bombings; https://oig.justice.qov/reports/2014/s1404.pdf 26 OIG Unclassified Report on Boston Marathon Bombings; https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2014/s1404.pdf 27 OIG Unclassified Report on Boston Marathon Bombings; https://oiq.justice.gov/reports/2014/s1404.pdf 28 OIG Unclassified Report on Boston Marathon Bombings; https://oiq.justice.gov/reports/2014/s1404.pdf This document will show the overwhelming evidence that the NCTC's extraordinary operating authority was used to enable select terrorists to succeed, and organized efforts to cover up the NCTC's involvement. Withholding key information from the appropriate U.S. Intelligence Agencies in order to allow certain terrorist attacks to succeed, resulting in the death and serious injury of citizens of both the U.S. and allied nations, is defined as "... providing aid and comfort to the enemy... " (Treason, 18 USC sec. 2381). The intentional failure to prevent these terrorist attacks, despite having significant advanced warnings and indications, induced the U.S. government to increase counterterrorism spending year after year. In just the case of TAC, and its successor companies, the aggregate of the increased spending from TTIC's 2003 founding to the present day is estimated to be $2.2 billion. The increased counterterrorism spending resulted in increasing the value of Brennan's personal equity stake in TAC, and its successor companies, from approximately $50,000 in 2009 to over $4,850,000 by 2011. Brennan continued to hide this windfall in his 401k account as late as May 2017.29 Overt Illegal Acts to pursue the Fraud: Brennan knowingly maintained his proprietary equity position in TAC, and its successor companies, in violation of Conflict of Interest laws (18 U.S. Code section 208), from January 20, 2009 through danuary 20, 2017. This 8-year period coincided with Brennan's tenure as the President's NSA/CT and Director CIA. In both offices, Brennan made numerous decisions that would logically be expected to affect the value of his equity stake in TAC, and its successor companies, in clear violation of relevant Conflict of Interest laws. Brennan was informed of this conflict of interest in February 2009 during his on-boarding processing as the President's NSA/CT.30 In furtherance of this scheme to defraud, Brennan misled an Office of Government Ethics (OGE) official by stating he would dispose of the assets in his TAC 401K account, causing the OGE official to make a false official statement.31 Instead of converting the assets as promised, Brennan simply changed the name of the account in which the assets were held from "TAC 401K" to "Sotera 401K" to hide his continued proprietary ownership of the indispensable government contractor.32 The reason the name of Brennan's 401K account changed from 'TAC 401K" to "Sotera 401K" was due to name, and ownership changes, of TAC, and its successor companies, under contractual requirements written by Brennan himself. When Brennan was President and CEO of TAC from November 7, 2005 until joining the Obama Administration in January 2009 he ensured the company's employee benefits program would pass-through from one successor corporate entity to the next without any changes to the content of employee (and ex-employee) 401k accounts.33 Brennan's updating the name change on his financial disclosure forms indicates his knowledge of both the contents of the accounts (shares of common stock in TAC and/or its successor companies) as well as the conflict of interest in continuing to own these assets while in a decision making position affecting the value of the companies involved.34 Further evidence of Brennan's knowingly hiding his proprietary interest was revealed during his transition from the President's NSA/CT to Director CIA in the January 2013 to March 2013 timeframe. __________________________________ 29 John 0. Brennan Separation Financial Disclosure Form e278, dated April 4, 2017. 30 A handwritten notation on Brennan's Feb 17, 2009 onboarding SF-278 indicates he knew of this conflict of interest. The handwritten note, "... ** per the filer, in the process of rolling over Analysis Corp 401K into IRA. - REM 02.17.09... " was written by the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) official who went over the SF-278 with Brennan to ferret out any conflicts of interest. 31 Financial Disclosure Form SF-278 for John 0. Brennan, Dated February 17, 2009 32 Electronic Financial Disclosure Forms for John 0. Brennan for the years 2013 through 2017 33" ... As with our employee benefits, there will be no change to GTEC's current 401(k) plan..."; https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1471038/000095012311021718/c13608sc14d9c.htm Transition Time Frame The proximity of the meetings in the following timeline are significant: 1/07/2013 - Brennan was nominated by POTUS to be Director CIA 1/14/2013 - Brennan, POTUS & Saudi Intelligence Chief held a morning meeting in the Oval Office where the Saudi's inform POTUS & Brennan to beware of Tamerlan Tsarnaev.35 1/14/2013 - Following the Oval Office meeting Brennan made an appointment to meet with Alexander Drew, President Intelligence Operations, for the TAC successor company Setera Defense Solutions, and Andrea M. Solomon Drew, Assistant Inspector General, CIA.36 1/16/2013 - Brennan meets with Alexander Drew and his wife Andrea M. Solomon Drew in the West Wing.37 1/23/2013 - Brennan filed an ethics pledge, "... The purpose of this letter describes the steps I will take to avoid any actual or apparent conflict of interest in the event I am confirmed for the position of Director, Central Intelligence Agency... "38 3/08/2013 - Brennan Financial Disclosure form for Dir. CIA lists Setera Defense Solutions 401k valued between $100,001 and $250,000.39 A false official statement. The preponderance of the evidence in just this two month period indicates Brennan knew the value of his Setera holdings by meeting with his personal successor at TAC = GTEC = Setera (Alexander Drew), and Brennan knew his legal responsibilities, and intentionally subverted them. Brennan's history vis-a-vis TTIC. NCTC, TAC and then the White House and the CIA: It is necessary to understand Brennan's employment history in this long running scheme to defraud the U.S. Government. Brennan established the TTIC using The Analysis Corporation (TAC) as the foundational indispensable government contractor. Brennan transitioned from Director TTIC to Director NCTC while continuing to use TAC as the indispensable government contractor. Brennan retired as Director NCTC on Nov 2, 2005. And, in a press release written two days prior, on Oct 31, 2005, it was announced Brennan would become the next President and CEO of TAC, the indispensable government contractor, on Nov 7, 2005.40 _________________________________________ 34 https://cryptome.org/2015/06/cia-john-brennan-financial.pdf 35 https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2317493/Saudi-Arabian-ambassador-Washington-DENIES-nation-warned-United-States-Tamerlan-Tsarnaev-2012.html 39 White House Visitor Log found on https://gresear.ch/?g=john+brennan 37 White House Visitor Log found on https://qresear.ch/?g=john+brennan 38 https://cryptome.org/2015/06/cia-john-brennan-financial.pdf; includes the ethics pledge letter 1/23/2013. 39 https://cryptome.org/2015/06/cia-john-brennan-financial.pdf 40 https://www.bizjournals.com/baltimore/stories/2005/10/31/daily38.html As noted above, TAC provided proprietary software programs and database management to the Department of State and the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) since 1990. As the inaugural director of the TTIC at the CIA, Brennan relied upon TAC's programmatic and intellectual property control of watch listing for the State Department and CIA as the foundation of the TTIC's list of individual terrorists around the world. TAC's proprietary software and programmatic history in terrorist watch listing made it the indispensable government contractor for tracking terrorists. At the time Brennan became President and CEO of TAC, TAC was a wholly owned subsidiary of Sachs Freeman Associates, Inc. (SFA, lnc.).41 Brennan arranged the sale of SFA, Inc. and its subsidiary TAC to Global Strategies Group, a UK defense contractor owned by Damian Perl.42 SFA, Inc. was sold to Global Strategies Group for the express purpose of arranging the "spin off' of TAC for an Initial Public Offering (IPO).43 The process of spinning off TAC followed a somewhat convoluted name change process:44 • SFA, Inc (with TAC) was succeeded by Global Strategies Group (North America), Inc., also known as GNA Holdings, TAC was succeeded by Global Technology Strategies, Inc. and SFA, Inc. became a separate company45 • Global Technology Strategies, Inc. was succeeded by Contego Systems. Inc. with the name Contego NewCo Company, which was • succeeded by Contego Systems, Inc., which was • succeeded by Contego Systems. LLC, which was • succeeded by Global Defense Technology & Systems, Inc. Global Defense Technology & Systems, Inc. was the TAC-successor entity that applied to the Securities and Exchange Commission for an Initial Public Offering (IPO) with stock symbol GTEC.46 Brennan was still President and CEO of TAC and a Board member of Global Defense Technology & Systems, Inc. when these ownership changes took place.47 Eight months after Brennan left Global Defense Technology & Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: GTEC) the company changed its name again to Setera Defense Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: GTEC) on August 26, 2009. Brennan's employment contract48 granted him an initial stock option of 5A90 share of common stock as of the closing date (February 9, 2007) of the sale of SFA, Inc. and its subsidiary, TAC, Inc., to Global Technology Strategies, lnc.49 "... The 5,490 shares of common stock represented 1.5% of the shares of the company on a fully diluted basis as of the closing date.50 The vesting schedule of these options for The Executive's Initial Grant shall vest as follows: (i) 25% will vest on the first anniversary of the _______________________________ 41 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The Analysis Corporation; copied on 6/15/2019 42  https://news.thomasnet.com/companystory/global-strateqies-qroup-and-sfa-inc-combine-forces-508530 43 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1471038/000119312509187027/ds1.htm 44 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1471038/000119312509224857/ds1a.htm#toc36942  7 45 https://washingtontechnology.com/Articles/2007/06/22/Technoloqy-with-a-human-touch.aspx 46 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1471038/000119312509187027/ds1.htm 47 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1471038/000119312509187027/ds1.htm 48 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1471038/000119312510120468/dex1011.htm 49 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/ data/1471038/000119312510120468/dexl0ll. htm 50 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1471038/000119312510120468/dex1011.htm Closing Date (emphasis added]; (ii) 25% will vest on the second anniversary of the Closing Date; (iii) 25% will vest on the third anniversary of the Closing Date; and (iv) 25% will vest on the fourth anniversary of the Closing Date..."51 Significance of "Outstanding" Stock Options: The difference between outstanding stock options and realized stock awards is significant in light of an ethics waiver the Obama Administration gave Brennan on December 30, 2009.53 The waiver was issued following the Dec 25, 2009 Christmas bombing attack on Northwest Airline's Flight 253, the Christmas Underwear bombing. The bomber, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, attempted to down the flight using a bomb hidden in his underwear. President Obama ordered Brennan to conduct an after action review to determine how Abdulmutallab was able to get on the aircraft following security screening. The waiver in question was issued to avoid charges of "conflict of interest" because Brennan had been CEO of the indispensable government contractor, which provided terrorist watch-listing for the government. The waiver named the company The Analysis Corporation, but legally the company was now named Setera Defense Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: GTEC).54 The waiver falsely states Brennan no longer had a financial interest in The Analysis Corporation because he forfeited his outstanding options.55 The waiver studiously avoids mentioning the fact TAC changed its name to Global Defense Technology & Systems, Inc. (NASDAQ: GTEC) in July 2009, and a month later to Setera Defense Solutions, Inc. (NASDAQ: GTEC). And the waiver ignored the fact Brennan still had a financial interest in the successor company by owning stock in GTEC in his TAC/GTEC/Sotera 401K. The specific wording of the waiver was used to hide Brennan's continued proprietary ownership in the very company with the most to gain financially from his after action review of the Christmas Underwear bombing. Knowingly hiding Brennan's proprietary ownership interest in TAC's successor company caused a false official statement to be issued. ____________________________________ 51  https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1471038/000119312510120468/dexl0ll.htm 52 httos://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1471038/000119312510120468/ds1a.htm#tx46506  111 53 December 30, 2009, MEMORANDUM FOR JOHN BRENNAN FROM: NORMAN EISEN Special Counsel to the President and Designated Agency Ethics Official 54 December 30, 2009, MEMORANDUM FOR JOHN BRENNAN FROM: NORMAN EISEN Special Counsel to the President and Designated Agency Ethics Official 55 December 30, 2009, MEMORANDUM FOR JOHN BRENNAN FROM: NORMAN EISEN Special Counsel to the President and Designated Agency Ethics Official SFA, Inc., a $500 million defense and intelligence contractor in its own right, continued to operate as an independent subsidiary, retaining its name, management team, employees and infrastructure.56 Global Defense Technology & Systems, Inc. {NASDAQ: GTEC) notified the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) it would adopt the pre-existing SFA/TAC Stock Option Plan (401K) with no substantive changes, hereinafter identified as the TAC 401K.57 According to his financial disclosure statement Brennan had between $50,000 and $100,000 worth of TAC shares in his TAC 401K account.58 GTEC notified the SEC that immediately prior to the IPO, GTEC would conduct a stock split of 60,000 to 1, but no participant in the company 401K plan (i.e. Brennan) would receive more than 200,000 shares in any one calendar year to avoid balance sheet issues.59 Since GTEC assumed the SFA/TAC 401K without any changes, and following the 60,000 to 1 stock split with the 200,000 share limit, Brennan's TAC 401K would: • Be known as a GTEC 401K, and • Now hold at least 200,000 shares of common stock in place of _the 1,373 shares his contract provided. Prior to the IPO, GTEC notified the SEC it would change its name to Setera Defense Industries, Inc., but it would retain the GTEC stock symbol. GTEC also informed the SEC that it would rename its GTEC 401K to the Setera 401K with no substantive changes to the contents of the 401K accounts. Brennan's TAC 401k account would now be named Setera 401K. Brennan documented this 401K account name change on all his Director CIA financial disclosure forms. Brennan changing the name of his 401K account on his financial disclosure forms indicates he was fully aware of both the name changes and his continued proprietary interest in the indispensable government contractor, in violation of conflict of interest laws. Brennan left GTEC prior to the Initial Public Offering and the Setera name change, but according to his 2009 White House onboarding Financial Disclosure Form (SF-278) mentioned above, he kept ownership of his TAC 401K plan, and was aware this was a conflict of interest violation. Following the IPO, GTEC's stock price settled at approximately $10.50-therefore Brennan's estimated 200,000 shares in his now Setera 401K had a notional value of $2,100,000. The exact value of Brennan's Setera 401K when he ended his tenure as Director CIA is unknown at this time due to subsequent ownership changes of Setera (GTEC). Based on SEC filings, it appears the value of his Setera 401K had an actual cash value of $4,850,000 when Ares Management purchased Setera for $24.25 per share in cash on March 2, 2011.60 According to Brennan's Financial Disclosure forms he continued to claim he only had about $150,000 in his Setera 401K account upon departure from the CIA in 2017 - an apparent false official statement. __________________________________________ 56 https://washingtontechnology.com/Articles/2007/06/22/Technology-with-a-human-touch.aspx 57 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1471038/000119312509187027/ds1.htm 58  http://online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/Brennan.pdf 59 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1471038/000119312509211306/ds1a.htm 60 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1471038/000095012311032487/c15093sv8pos.htm Brennan knowingly maintained an equity ownership position in a company which was an indispensable government contractor whose value was directly affected by day-to-day decisions made by John 0. Brennan for an 8-year period. A period of time in which several notable terrorist attacks against the United States and its allies, during a time of war, succeeded; despite overwhelming evidence of prior warnings and indications that should have allowed US authorities to prevent these attacks. Record of Preventable Terrorist Attacks on the United States: It is alleged Brennan, and others unknown, went further than mere conflicts of interest, in that they mis-used the CT Intel Info-monopoly Brennan set up to sequester key information about particular suspected terrorists from the other members of the Intelligence Community (IC) through misuse of information compartmentalization procedures. By withholding the key information, Brennan, and others unknown, allowed a small number of terrorist attacks to succeed in order to induce increased government CT funding and increase the value of their investment portfolios. At the time of the following attacks, Brennan was either the President's NSA/CT or the Director CIA. Example #1 : Christmas 2009 'underwear' bomber, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab Following boarding Northwest Airlines Flight 253 in Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab attempted to destroy the plane in flight on Christmas Day, 2009 with a bomb hidden in his underwear. US News Media reports at the time included eyewitness testimony by Kurt and Lori Haskell that indicated a CIA officer, undercover as a US diplomat, helped Abdulmutallab board the plane and avoid all security screenings. 61 62 Subsequent Congressional testimony confirmed Abdulmutallab was a known terrorist, who was in contact with Anwar AI-Awlaki, and he was reported to the NCTC by the CIA for monitoring. TAC/GTEC/Sotera was the indispensable government contractor operating both the NCTC and the FBl's Terrorist Screening Center (TSC) in December 2009. Abdulmutallab's identity was not provided to the FBl's Terrorist Screening Center by either the NCTC or the indispensable government contractor, prior to his boarding the aircraft. Withholding (compartmentalizing) Abdulmutallab's identity from the FBI Terrorist Screening Center in this case appears as justifiable intelligence trade craft. The CIA facilitating Abdulmutallab's travel to the U.S. was probably part of a CIA operation to recruit Abdulmutallab as an agent in place. It is likely the NCTC also sent notice to the NSA to compartmentalize any past, present and future, signals intelligence collected related to Abdulmutallab to avoid any other agency discovering the CIA operation. On its face, it appears the US government may have been trying to help Abdulmutallab get into the U.S. without a record of his travel so the CIA could recruit him to spy on his fellow terrorists in Yemen. But, the actions of the Obama Administration vis-a-vis John 0. Brennan regarding the incident were completely out of place as noted above. 63 Brennan and President Obama knew Abdulmutallab wasn't screened prior to boarding the plane because an undercover CIA ___________________________________ 61 http://haskellfamily.blogspot.com/2012/02/victim-impact-statement.html 62 https://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/32467 Page2.html 63 December 30, 2009, MEMORANDUM FOR JOHN BRENNAN - FROM: NORMAN EISEN Special Counsel to the President and Designated Agency Ethics Official Case Officer prevented his screening by anyone.64 It could be argued a White House announcement of a pretext after-action-review might have been considered necessary to hide the CIA recruitment operation, publicizing the fraudulent Ethics Waiver was not necessary at all. First, Brennan was issued a fraudulent Ethics Waiver (he still had a financial interest)65 and then the White House announced a bogus after-action review to cover up the CIA's involvement. And when the bogus review was "completed11 it was used to publically attack the competency of other US Intelligence Agencies, when President Obama and Brennen both knew these other agencies were not at fault for Abdulmutallab being placed in a position to terrorize the flying public.66 More recent reviews of publically available information prove Brennan's NCTC, and the indispensable government contractor received hundreds of millions of dollars in increased funding as a result of Abdulmutallab's attack.67 The testimony of Michael Leitner, then Director NCTC, confirms that facilitating a terror attack draws increased counterterrorism funding from congress. This increased spending increased the value of GTEC and therefore increased Brennan's net worth.68 Example #2 : July 22, 2011 Oslo and Utoya, Norway attacks by Anders Breivik. The author's personal knowledge of the US government allowing a terror attack to succeed were the July 22, 2011 Oslo and Utoya, Norway attacks by Anders Breivik. Immediately prior to his attack, Breivik merged his attack preparation diary with his manifesto and then published the combined manifesto/diary to over 1,000 Facebook accounts. On or about July 27, 2011, after reviewing Breivik's diary, the author submitted an analysis of Breivik's diary to the FBI Tip line from his employer email account.69 The analysis showed Breivik's online activity must have brought him to the attention of U.S. Intelligence at least 6-months prior to the attack.70 Breivik used Google for 16-hours a day, for two straight weeks, where he entered thousands of search terms in the Google search engine related to building an improvised explosive device (IED). His clearly obsessive use of Google from his home in Norway was followed up with Breivik then purchasing the pre-cursor chemicals for his VBIED online, in true name, using his personal credit card, and his true home address for delivery of the pre-cursor chemicals. This was not the online footprint of a pimply faced teenager in his mom's basement- it was the footprint of a committed terrorist building a car bomb. The author's submission to the FBI also detailed that personnel moves in President Obama's Cabinet prior to Breivik's attacks were timed to coincide with significant milestones in Breivik's preparations for the attack (evidence of knowledge prior to the event). Following the submission of the author's tip to the FBI, the author was surprised to see all U.S. domiciled News Media outlets cease reporting on the Norway bombing/mass shooting after July 27, 2011, the date of his submission. These US-domiciled News Media corporations' overseas outlets (such as CNN International) continued to report on the incident 24-hours a day, 7-days a week for months on end overseas, but their U.S. based outlets did not. By ending reporting on the story, the US-domiciled News Media outlets caused US public interest in the event to diminish rapidly and significantly. The loss in advertising revenue these companies experienced by virtue of abandoning coverage of such a huge public interest story must have been in the tens of millions of dollars. ________________________________ 64 http://haskellfamily.blogspot.com/2012/02/victim-impact-statement.html 65 December 30, 2009, MEMORANDUM FOR JOHN BRENNAN - FROM: NORMAN EISEN Special Counsel to the President and Designated Agency Ethics Official 66 https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/contenUarticle/2010/06/05/AR2010060502969 2.html 67 https:t/www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6115/how-the-underwear-bomber-chanqed-counterterrorism/ 88 https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/a6115/how-the-underwear-bomber-chanqed-counterterrorism/ 69 In response to a FOIA request by the author, the FBI reported they were unable to find any reference to the Tip line report. In light of FBI history of intentionally providing misleading responses to FOIA requests it is believed a lawsuit will be required to find evidence of the Tip author submitted. 70 https://edwardsnowden.com/2015/08/12/targets-visitinq-specific-websites/ Why would these corporations forgo so much easy money? The news blackout was nationwide. The US-domiciled News Media outlets of: ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, FOXNEWS, NPR, the NY Times, the Washington Post, the NY Daily News, the LA Times, the Miami Herald, the Boston Globe, the Dallas Morning News, Breitbart, etc., and Rush Limbaugh, Mark Levin, and all the other radio, TV, and internet outlets all ceased reporting on the same day; this is a demonstrable fact. • Who coordinated the cessation of reporting by only US-domiciled News Media outlets? • Who has the authority to obtain such a timely, coordinated response by so many competing, and ideologically opposed, US-domiciled News Media outlets spread out over 3,000 miles and 3 time zones? Only the President of the United States (POTUS) has the authority to control information by US media corporations on a continental scale, and only for national security purposes. The author's submission to the FBI specifically indicated it was Obama Administration Cabinet members who were retiring or changing Cabinet posts in relation to Breivik's preparatory activity. The primary beneficiary of the emergency news blackout was the only person with the authority to order the news blackout, President Obama. Secondary beneficiaries were the individual Cabinet Secretaries, who were provided political cover by serendipitously retiring or moving to new posts just prior to the attacks, and investors in companies like the indispensable government contractor. As you may recall, Breivik attacked the Government of a U.S. ally (Norway) during a declared state of war (Global War on Terror).71 This state of war included the only time in history when Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty was declared to be in effect and all NATO nations (Norway in,cluded) activated armed forces to aid the U.S. Norway sent troops to fight in Afghanistan alongside U.S. forces. The constitution declares"... This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof,· and all Treaties made ... are the supreme law of the land... 11 The United States government's obligations under the North Atlantic Treaty take precedence over domestic political maneuvering by any politician in any office established by our constitution. Intentionally withholding information that a reasonable person would conclude may prevent an enemy's successful VBIED and mass shooting attack on the government of a NATO ally, during a time of war, is best described as "...providing aid and comfort to the enemy... " ___________________________________ 71 Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere. USAToday reports that, Stoere "... called Breiviks's actions a deliberate attack on the Norwegian government and a new generation of Norwegian politicians... Breivik intended to spread fear and panic, Stoere said. 'We will not let that happen... The attack in Oslo will not change our politics, values and the way we engage internationally... " ; source: https://archive.org/stream/PODESTA4/PODESTA%204_djvu.txt (Treason; 18 US Code, Ch. 115). Corroboration of US Intelligence foreknowledge of Breivik's attack: In 2013, Edward Snowden revealed Top Secret National Security Agency (NSA) signals intelligence (SIGINT) programs; among which were PRISM, FAIRVIEW, BLARNEY, STORMBREW, OAKSTAR, and XKeyScore. Subsequent media reports indicated that the information Snowden leaked was accurate and extremely damaging to US intelligence collection efforts. PRISM is reportedly the NSA's Internet monitoring program which collects a massive amount of online data from all over the world. XKeyScore is reportedly the NSA's automated keyword analysis program that sifts through the massive amounts of data collected in NSA SIGINT operations. XKeyScore is believed to use algorithms to identify keywords, search-string queries, emails, webpages, texts, instant messages, IP addresses, telephone calls, online purchase transactions, travel reservations, and social media postings that relate to topics of interest to the U.S. government. During the time frame leading up to Breivik's attacks, the U.S. military was suffering numerous improvised explosive device (IED) attacks in both Iraq and Afghanistan. The number of killed and wounded became so great the Army instituted the Counter-Improvised Explosive Device (IED) Task Force in 2003, which was expanded by the Department of Defense (DOD) to become the Joint IED Task Force in 2004, and then became a permanent organization of the U.S. Military - the Joint IED Defeat Organization (JIEDDO) in February 2006. JIEDDO's name eventually changed to the Joint Improvised-Threat Defeat Organization (JIDO) and has an annual budget of over $550 million. From 2003 until today, the US Military - during a time of war - has been working to defeat the use of IEDs, including Vehicle Borne IEDs (VBIED), by non-state actors, just like Anders Breivik. The NSA is both a military and intelligence community entity. It is inconceivable that the NSA would not actively participate in a wartime, two decade old, program of the DOD to defeat IEDs used by anyone, anywhere in the world.72 Logically, if the U.S. was engaged in a war against terror where a key weapon of the terrorists were VBIEDs, then XKeyScore would have been formatted by the NSA to identify search-string queries, emails, webpages, texts, messages, IP addresses, online purchase transactions, travel reservations, telephone calls, and social media postings that carry key words and phrases related to building VBIEDs. It also stands to reason that XKeyScore would have been used to automatically analyze the data collected in the PRISM program to identify persons attempting to build or assemble VBIEDs - like Anders Breivik in Norway. And, these automated systems would then send appropriate electronic communications to authorized individuals (such as NCTC analysts) who needed to know about someone attempting to assemble a VBIED. As noted above, NCTC had the authority to direct NSA collection and dissemination of critical intelligence. Snowden's disclosures also revealed the NSA had 100 percent coverage of all Internet traffic in Norway by 2008.73 Therefore all of Breivik's online activity (searching for VBIED recipes, purchasing precursor chemicals, etc.) SHOULD HAVE BEEN collected and analyzed by XKeyScore, and sent to the appropriate U.S. Intelligence authorities. According to John 0. Brennan, NCTC was the "... someplace in the government where all counterterrorism information would reside... "74 Logically, the NSA's PRISM/XKeyScore system relayed the information about Breivik building a car bomb to attack a NATO ally to the NCTC. ________________________________________ 72 https://www. theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/31/nsa-top-secret-program-online-data 73 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/31/nsa-top-secret-proqram-online-data Snowden also revealed that Google, Inc. began participating in the PRISM program in the same year that the NSA achieved 100 percent coverage of Internet activity in Norway - 2008.75 According to Breivik's manifesto he was still conducting historical research about the interaction between Islam and Europe in 2008. It was not until 2-years later (2010), well into the establishment of the PRISM and XKeyScore SIGINT programs on the NSA's Norway data collection, and over 5-years after the DOD's high priority IED defeat efforts, when Breivik began seriously researching how to build a VBIED - using only the Google search engine for this purpose. Post-publication modification of Breivik's manifesto/diary Further open source confirmation of the Obama Administration involvement in a cover-up of advanced knowledge of the Breivik attack is revealed through the manipulation of those versions of Breivik's diary/manifesto that are still available online. The first instance is found in Breivik's diary where he reported conducting a two-week marathon of bomb-making-Google-searches in September 2010.76 All currently available online versions of Breivik's diary/manifesto reviewed by the author have been altered to obscure that date. Some versions have the date changed to October 2010, and some versions remove any date for his online, bomb-making, research-marathon altogether. Why modify this date and not any of the other information - like accurate recipes of how to make other weapons of mass destruction? The September 2010 date is important because it was the first verifiable marker that appeared to initiate the Obama Cabinet musical chairs activity. It was when Breivik noted in his computer diary that he completed his research-marathon that then Secretary of Defense Robert Gates announced he would retire in the next year, but Secretary Gates stated he didn't know exactly when he would retire.[reference needed] Gates retirement was necessary to insulate him from any blame when Breivik struck. Gates would be out of office, and other Cabinet members could move around as well. Then Director CIA Leon Panetta would become the new Secretary of Defense post and would not be held accountable for an "intelligence failure" by the public. The second post-publication modification to Breivik's manifesto/diary were edits of Breivik's entry related to his 60-day countdown to his attacks.77 When Breivik noted in his computer diary that he began his 60-day countdown that day, then Secretary of Defense Gates announced he would be retiring in 30-days. {reference needed] This announcement kicked of a waterfall of Obama Cabinet-level moves. Leon Panetta to Secretary of Defense from CIA, General David Petraeus to CIA, and then the completely unprecedented extension of FBI Director Mueller's tenure for two additional years. This last change of the FBI Director's term required a new federal law. The scramble set off by Breivik's announcement enabled the Obama Administration to obtain the new law in only 3-days, from initiation to signing. These precipitous moves by the Obama Administration simply confirmed the connection with Breivik's preparations. __________________________________________ 74 https://www.cia.gov/library/readinqroom/docs/DOC 0005618307. pdf 75  https://theintercept.com/2015/07/01/nsas-google-worlds-private-communications/ 76 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence, by Andrew Berwick 77 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence. by Andrew Berwick It is important to note that Breivik's 60-day countdown notation was not announced publically - he simply noted it on his computer. For Secretary Gates to be aware of this private notation it would mean Breivik's computer was penetrated by a key logger program implanted by an intelligence service - just the sort of exploit we find the CIA had in Wikileaks Vault 7 materials.78 In the currently available Breivik manifesto/diary, the 60-day countdown reference has been removed and a new countdown added that does not correlate with Breivik's actions, and doesn't follow his style of writing.79 This new countdown was inserted to prevent any correlation with Secretary Gates' retirement announcements. Secondarily, the new countdown can be used to protect Brennan as well. John Brennan meeting history in relation to Breivik's 60-day countdown In the original Breivik manifesto/diary, Breivik noted the day he began his 60-day countdown, but not the actual date of his planned attack. Breivik did not write, "...today I began my 60-day countdown to my attack on July 22...'' By not mentioned the actual date of his planned attack Breivik a reader of the key logger capture could not say with certainty the date of the planned attack - he could only say it will be on one of two days - July 21 or Jul 22. Did the attack date fall on exactly 60-days hence, or did it fall on the day after the 60-day clock? This ambiguity is important in relation to Brennan and a series of meetings he held in the run-up to the Norway attacks and then during their aftermath. The number of meetings of the total documented by the White House which can be tied to a specific event in the Breivik saga indicates the meetings are related Breivik's activity. The record of those meetings follow: Michael Jones, tentatively identified as a State Department Diplomatic Security Agent, who began his USDS tenure as an Intelligence Analyst, made an appointment, or visited, with John 0. Brennan in the White House on the following dates: Date Possible Significance July 20, 2011 - Jones made two calls to White House for two appointment to meet with Brennan on July 21. July 21, 2011- Jones met with Brennan in the State Place DR at 1300 ET and then at 1430 ET.  Jones then made two calls to White House for two appointments with Brennan on July 22, the first for 1330 ET and the second for 1530 ET. ___________________________________ 78  https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/hacking-of-america/wikileaks-mystery-how-were-cia-hacking-tools-stolen-n730921 79 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence. by Andrew Berwick July 22, 2011 - At 0726 ET Breivik detonates VBIED and at approximately 0900 ET begins his shooting attacks. Jones met with Brennan in the State Place DR at 1330 ET and 1530 ET. Jul 26, 2011 Michael Clapper, brother of James Clapper, DNI, receives notice from the author that US Intelligence may have known of Breivik's plans prior to the attack and is asked to forward the notice to DNI Clapper.80 July 27, 2011 FBI received a Tip online that US Intelligence knew of Breivik's plan 6-months in advance.81 ALL US-domiciled News Media outlets CEASED independent reporting on the Norway attacks. Only POTUS can order this cessation.  Jones met with Brennan at 1400 ET in the State Place DR. Jones met with Brennan at 1530 ET in the State Place DR. Jul 28, 2011 John Donovan is confronted by Terry Gudaitis, VP, Cyveillance, Inc. about sending a Tip to the FBI the previous day.82 John Donovan is notified he will be fired.83 July 29, 2011 Michael Jones met with Brennan at 1100 ET in State Place DR.  Michael Jones met with Brennan at 1230 ET in State Place DR. Aug 26, 2011 Michael Jones met with Brennan at 1330 ET in the State Place DR.  This date marks completion of 13 separate forensic psychology interviews of Breivik, which began on Aug 10.84 Apr 12, 2012 - Michael Jones made appointment to meet with Brennan at 1330 ET at State Place DR. Apr 13, 2012 - Friday prior to Monday, 4/16/2012, the day Breivik's trial began in Norway. Michael Jones met with Brennan at 1330 ET in State Place DR Jun 22, 2012 - Breivik's trial in Norway ends. Jun 25, 2012 - Michael Jones made appointment to tour the White House Residence on Jul 10, 2012. Jul 10,2012 - Michael Jones participates in Tour of Residence (were any photos taken of Mr. Jones in the Residence?) Sep 10, 2012 - Michael Jones made appointment to meet Brennan in State Place DR at 1230 ET. Sep 11, 2012 - Dzhokhar Tsarnaev naturalization ceremony . Michael Jones met with Brennan in State Place DR at 1230 ET. Dec 6, 2012 - Michael Jones made appointment to meet Brennan at 0800 ET on Dec 7, 2012 in State Place DR Dec 7, 201 2 - Michael Jones met with Brennan at 0800 ET in State Place DR. The ambiguity of Breivik's 60-day countdown note is confirmed in Michael Jones initial meetings with Brennan. Someone receiving keylogger data from Breivik's computer could not be sure of the exact date of his planned attack based on the 60-day countdown notation. This could explain why Jones arranged to meet Brennan so many times in the July 21 & Jul 22 time frame. ______________________________________ 80 John K. Donovan, personal recollection 81 John K. Donovan, personal recollection 82 John K. Donovan, personal recollection 83 John K. Donovan, personal recollection 84 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3619172/#b4 Coordinated Manipulation of Breivik's manifesto/diary post publication The coordinated manipulation of a few lines of text in the contents of a 1,500 page pdf file, hosted on multiple personal computers, located in different countries around the world, without the knowledge of the owners of the targetted personal computers, is a hacking technique specifically disclosed in Snowden's NSA material. This hacking technique was also disclosed in the Wikileaks Vault 7 reporting of CIA hacking tools.85 The level of sophistication required to ensure complete coverage of all personal computers that were either sent, or downloaded, the Breivik diary/manifesto is enormous. The editing effort couldn't just focus on the 1,000 computers that initially received Breivik's manifesto/diary. The intelligence agency "editors" had to track each and every computer that viewed, emailed, or downloaded the diary/manifesto. Only a State-level entity could assemble the personnel and tools necessary just to sift through hundreds of millions of personal computers to identify which computers downloaded the file. And only a State-level entity would have the specialized resources to then edit a few lines in a 1,500-page file on each of those computers without leaving footprints. Only a government sponsored intelligence agency such as the NSA or the CIA can perform such a herculean task. The required hacking capabilities for such a huge operation are only available to well-funded, State-level intelligence agencies. Under U.S. law only the NSA is authorized to carry out such activities - no other U. S. entity is legally allowed to conduct such widespread computer penetration operations; neither in the U.S. or overseas [emphasis addecfj.66 87 However, as noted above, there was a second "State-level actor" in the U.S. who illegally developed and used technical capabilities only the NSA is authorized to have.88 This second "State-level actor", the CIA89, had extremely close ties with John 0. Brennan, Obama's NSA/CT when Breivik struck against our ally Norway. And Brennan was a frequent participant in Cabinet meetings with the very Cabinet members who apparently felt a need to move from their current post in correlation with Breivik's preparations for his attack. Brennan was made Director of this second state actor by President Obama, the very person in the U.S. government who needed this particular manifesto/diary file edited throughout the world. ____________________________________ 85 https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/hacking-of-america/wikileaks-mystery-how-were-cia-hacking-tools-stolen-n730921 86 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of I 978 (FISA) 87 https://www.archives.gov/federal-reqister/codification/executive-order/12333.html, "... No other department or agency may engage in signals intelligence activities except pursuant to a delegation by the Secretary of Defense... " 88 https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/hacking-of-america/wikileaks-mystery-how-were-cia-hacking-tools-stolen-n730921 89 https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/hacking-of-america/wikileaks-mystery-how-were-cia-hacking-tools-stolen-n730921 Only the NSA has legal authority to conduct the electronic intercept and widespread computer hacking function of the U.S. Intelligence Community. 90 91 We now know that the CIA developed its own capability contrary to the laws of the United States.92 Logically, the CIA had the ability to carry out the worldwide, Breivik diary/manifesto suppression operation, covering thousands of personal computers throughout the world.93 94 Only the Obama Administration had the motivation to task the CIA to undertake such a cover-up. Background related to Breivik's attacks: In .the hours prior to his attacks, Breivik merged his 'attack-preparation-diary-file' with his 'm1anifesto-file' into one file entitled: 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence, by Andrew Berwick. Breivik then sent this manifesto/diary to over 1,000 email addresses around the world. Breivik's diary revealed his exclusive use of the Google search engine to find information and instructions on how to build the VBIED he used against the Norwegian Prime Minister's office (killing 8).95 Breivik's diary also revealed his exclusive use of the Google search engine to plan his mass shooting attack on Utoya Island (killing 69). It is important to rer,ember, Breivik was targeting the Head of State and the ruling political party of Norway with these attacks - these were attacks on the government of Norway, a NATO member, during a time of war.96 A careful review of Breivik's manifesto yields the inescapable conclusion that his exclusive reliance on the Google search engine to research the details of, learn how to build, and then to pl!Jrchase the components of the VBIED he used against the Norwegian government, should have been captured, and analyzed, by the NSA's PRISM and XKeyScore programs. The question is who did the PRISM/XKeyScore system notify of Breivik's online activity? Breivik's concern about Intelligence Service online "Honey Pots" The diary portion of the manifesto revealed Breivik's great concern about operational security (OPSEC) vis-a-vis intelligence service monitoring of the online environment. 97 98 Breivik's OPSEC concerns did not match his OPSEC practices. Breivik ordered all of his bomb making materials online, in true name, using his home address for delivery, and paying for the items with his personal credit card. Breivik's manifesto/diary entries also indicate he downloaded approximately 100 guides, manuals, or books, on how to build an IED from various terrorism related websites. 99 Breivik recorded his concern that at least some of these terrorism websites were intelligence service "honey pots" and that he thought he would be monitored after accessing them. ______________________________ 90 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) 91 https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/12333.html, "...No other department or agency may engage in signals intelligence activities except pursuant to a delegation by the Secretary of Defense... 92  https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/hacking-of-america/wikileaks-mystery-how-were-cia-hacking-tools-stolen-n730921 93 https://www.wired.com/2017/03/cia-can-hack-phone-pc-tv-says-wikileaks/ 94https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/hacking-of-america/wikileaks-mystery-how-were-cia-hacking-tools-stolen-n730921 95 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence, bv Andrew Berwick 96 Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere. USAToday reports that, Steere "... called Breiviks's actions a deliberate attack on the Norwegian government and a new generation of Norwegian politicians... Breivik intended to spread fear and panic, Steere said. 'We will not let that happen... The attack in Oslo will not change our politics, values and the way we engage internationally... " ; source: https://archive.org/stream/PODESTA4/PODESTA%204_djvu.txt 97 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence bv Andrew Berwick. 98 https://edwardsnowden.com/2015/08/12/targets-visitinq-specific-websites/ 99 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence, by Andrew Berwick. It is extremely likely NSA internet SIGINT programs (such as PRISM) were monitoring at least some of these terrorism sites to capture the IP addresses of the computers that accessed such sites.100 It is extremely likely that a program like PRISM recorded which IP addresses downloaded the bomb assembly guides found on the terrorism website (in order to identify any potential terrorists). Other terrorism investigations reveal the investigative technique of monitoring a specific site (honey pot), or email account, is used by U.S. Intelligence. One such example relates to the many terrorism cases linked to Anwar AI-Awlaki, an American cleric who was a key influencer of various Al-Qaeda terrorists from before 9-11, through the Major Nidal Hassan shootings at Ft. Hood in 2009, the Christmas Bombing attempt of Northwest Flight 253, and the attempted bombing of civilian cargo aircraft in 2011. All of the terrorists involved had watched or listened to AI-Awlaki's sermons online. No doubt, PRISM and XKeyScore monitored those who accessed AI-Awlaki's webpages by using his webpages as "honey pots" and sent out the appropriate notifications.101 The question is who did the PRISM/XKeyScore system notify about the persons accessing AI-Awlaki's webpages over all those years?102 Breivik's online activity to assemble and build his VBIED Breivik recorded spending 200-hours during a two week period in September 2010 entering search strings related to assembling a VBIED from scratch.103 Breivik was a complete novice bomb builder with no prior training in bomb making.104 As noted above, all of Breivik's searches for bomb making instructions and recipes should have been captured, analyzed, and appropriate notifications sent out by the NSA's PRISM and XKeyScore programs. If one isolates the VBIED related search terms revealed in Breivik's manifesto for: chemicals, components, suppliers, recipes, designs, and suitable targets, for a VBIED attack; and then places those terms in a single column, these keywords stretch for 38 single-spaced pages.105 One can imagine XKeyScore overlooking one, two, or even a dozen, surreptitious searches for bomb making instructions in the vast sea of internet data. Or, one might believe someone conducting a day or two of searches for bomb related information due to adolescent curiosity. Breivik's online, bomb-making, research activity works out to be 16-hours per day for 14-days straight from one IP address in Norway!106 And then, the same IP address in Norway was used to order the pre-cursor chemicals for bomb making online, using the owner's true name, his valid delivery and billing address, and his personal credit card online.107 Breivik even mentioned his fear that his online purchases would place him on a watch list with intelligence services.108 ____________________________________ 100  https://edwardsnowden.com/2015/08/12/targets-visiting-specific-websites/ 101  https://edwardsnowden.com/2015/08/12/targets-visiting-specific-websites/ 102  https://edwardsnowden.com/2015/08/12/targets-visiting-specific-websites/ 103 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence. by Andrew Berwick. 104 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence. by Andrew Berwick. 105 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence. by Andrew Berwick. 106 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence, by Andrew Berwick. 107 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence. by Andrew Berwick. 108 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence. by Andrew Berwick. Given the foregoing information, one must conclude Breivik's online activity was, in fact, collected by the NSA's PRISM program, and that the search terms he used were recognized as significant in the XKeyScore program. Logic indicates the NSA had collected an overwhelming amount of information about someone in Norway building a VBIED; including the bomb maker's name, home address, IP address, and credit card information. The question is which US Intelligence entity requested the NSA provide updates on Breivik's online activities or actions? The record shows Obama's Cabinet Secretaries reacted to the information on Breivik's computer prior to Brievik's attack. Breivik's success indicates Norway was not warned of the impending attack. Example #3: The second time the author realized there was someone in our Intelligence Community who was actually allowing terror attacks against the United States, and our allies, was following the April 2013 Boston Marathon Bombing. The "disconnect" between the author's experience as an FBI Special Agent and what was reportedly done to investigate Tsarnaev prior to the attack was tob jarring for him to ignore. Tne author was aware of a special computer program for tracking the international travel of an intelligence officer or terrorist that had been in use for decades. The program is called Fuzzy Finder.109 It was apparent to the author that someone in U.S. Intelligence must have withheld key information about Tsarnaev's travel and activities in Russia from the FBI; which allowed the Boston Marathon Bombing to succeed. As noted above, all Russian FSB Counterterrorism communications to the FBI and the CIA were available to the NCTC as soon as the communications entered FBI and CIA databases - there was no need to "forward" the communications to NCTC. The NCTC could then use that information to place compartmentalization requests with the NSA for all SIGINT regarding T�arnaev - this would explain why the FBI agent did not see examples of Tsarnaev's email communications with known terrorists in Russia, records related to his purchasing tickets to fly to Russia, recordings of telephone calls of Tsarnaev with his mother, travel information about his return travel, etc., when the case agent was conducting his Guardian review. The record shows this CIA officer had no prior relationship with the targeted FSB officer and the pitch was doomed to fail.112 Only the Director CIA (then Brennan) can authorize a pitch in a denied area like Moscow. To all appearances it looks as if this recruitment attempt was set up to fail from the beginning... ____________________________________________ 109  https://www.chron.com/news/article/PRN-The-Analysis-Corporation-and-lnfoglide-1859462.php 110  https://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-spy-agency-claims-cia-agent-arrested-for-tryinq-to-recruit-russian-agent-in-moscow/ 111 https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/15/world/europe/russia-detains-american-sayinq-he-is-cia-aqent.html 112 https://www.washinqtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2013/05/14/heres-the-spy-recruitment-letter-alleqedly-found-on-cia-agent-in-moscowl?noredirect=on&utm term=.e2c8dbd804a5 Is there a reason Director CIA Brennan would want the recruitment of a Russian Intelligence Officer to fail? When an Intelligence Officer from a rather closed society like Russia is pitched by the "opposition", it is a pretty standard response that the "pitched" officer is prohibited frem travelling outside Russia. Historically, Russian Intelligence have viewed recruitment targets in their ranks as someone who is 'vulnerable' and they don't want to expose the officer to future recruitment efforts. Russian Intelligence Services have historically prevented a vulnerable officer from travelling overseas to protect their Intelligence Officer from having contact with the "opposition" again. Understanding how the opposition will institutionally react to a particular action enables one to use that reaction for a particular purpose. It is not beyond the realm of possibility that CIA Director Brennan approved the "cold pitch" in order to "quarantine" the FSB Officer from travelling to the U.S. to help in the Tsarnaev investigation. The fact this "cold pitch" blew the cover of a young CIA Case Officer was probably viewed as collateral damage. The common denominator in all these instances was John 0. Brennan's personal involvement. Based on that common denominator, the author took a deep dive into the publically available information. The result is the allegation Brennan, and un-named others, were using the NCTC to maintain a "CT Intel Info-monopoly" so they could "front run" events and pick and choose which terrorists would succeed against the U.S. in order to boost their investment portfolios. It was only in 2019 the author discovered Brennan's hidden ownership in TAC, and its successor companies. By allowing Americans and our allies to be maimed and murdered, Brennan was able to increase the value of his investments. The author realizes these allegations are very serious - failure to protect a NATO ally in a time of war is treason, and punishable by death. Profiting from intentionally allowing the death and injury of innocents is simply... disgusting. Conclusion: The preponderance of the evidence proves: 1) Brennan, and others unknown, set up a "CT Intel Info-monopoly' in the form of the NCTC that relied on an indispensable government contractor. 2) Brennan retired from US Government service to become the President and CEO of the indispensable government contractor, 3)  Brennan arranged the sale of the indispensable government contractor to an investor so that the indispensable government contractor could be spun off in an Initial Public Offering (IPO); Brennan got stock in the indispensable government contractor. 4) The "CT Intel Info-monopoly" logically enabled Brennan, and others unknown at the indispensable government contractor, to have advanced knowledge of at least two pending terror attacks, and this advanced knowledge was withheld from appropriate U.S. Intelligence authorities. 5) The information withheld by the "CT Intel Info-monopoly'' resulted in successful attacks on U.S. and allied nation citizens. 6) The successful attacks induced the U.S. Government to spend billions of dollars in excess funds to prevent similar attacks in the future. 7) The additional spending resulted in at least $2.2 billion in funding to the indispensable government contractor. 8) Brennan filed four false official statements in the form of Financial Disclosure forms that hid his proprietary ownership of the indispensable government contractor in violation of Conflict of Interest laws. 9) Brennan was able to increase the value of his proprietary ownership in the indispensable government contractor from approximately $150,000 to $2,100,000 in November 25, 2009; and then increased the $2,100,000 to $4,850,000 on April 4, 2011 as the result of his hidden ownership.113 Brennan,  et al, set up a Counterterrorism Intelligence Information Monopoly (CT Intel Info-Monopoly) to hide critical national intelligence from our Republic.  Resting on the foundation of an indispensable government contractor,  originally known as The Analysis Corporation, used the worldwide reach of the NSA to identify a seemingly suitable terror-candidate (actor) they would allow to succeed - then, again, they used this CT Intel Info-Monopoly to prevent any other Intelligence or Law Enforcement Agency from gathering enough facts to stop the terror-candidate. Logically, they would have to have a few terror-candidates in the queue because some cop on the street may just stumble upon any particular terror-candidate during the terror-candidate's preparatory activity.  The well engineering and organized criminal scheme cost American and NATO lives, while Mr. Brennan, and presumably other, enriched themselves financially. We The People must hold this criminal activity within our government accountable immediately. _________________________________ 113 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edqar/data/1471038/000095012311032487/c15093sv8pos. htm END LETTER (Treason; 18 US Code, Ch. 115). Corroboration of US Intelligence foreknowledge of Breivik's attack: In 2013, Edward Snowden revealed Top Secret National Security Agency (NSA) signals intelligence (SIGINT) programs; among which were PRISM, FAIRVIEW, BLARNEY, STORMBREW, OAKSTAR, and XKeyScore. Subsequent media reports indicated that the information Snowden leaked was accurate and extremely damaging to US intelligence collection efforts. PRISM is reportedly the NSA's Internet monitoring program which collects a massive amount of online data from all over the world. XKeyScore is reportedly the NSA's automated keyword analysis program that sifts through the massive amounts of data collected in NSA SIGINT operations. XKeyScore is believed to use algorithms to identify keywords, search-string queries, emails, webpages, texts, instant messages, IP addresses, telephone calls, online purchase transactions, travel reservations, and social media postings that relate to topics of interest to the U.S. government. During the time frame leading up to Breivik's attacks, the U.S. military was suffering numerous improvised explosive device (IED) attacks in both Iraq and Afghanistan. The number of killed and wounded became so great the Army instituted the Counter-Improvised Explosive Device (IED) Task Force in 2003, which was expanded by the Department of Defense (DOD) to become the Joint IED Task Force in 2004, and then became a permanent organization of the U.S. Military - the Joint IED Defeat Organization (JIEDDO) in February 2006. JIEDDO's name eventually changed to the Joint Improvised-Threat Defeat Organization (JIDO) and has an annual budget of over $550 million. From 2003 until today, the US Military - during a time of war - has been working to defeat the use of IEDs, including Vehicle Borne IEDs (VBIED), by non-state actors, just like Anders Breivik. The NSA is both a military and intelligence community entity. It is inconceivable that the NSA would not actively participate in a wartime, two decade old, program of the DOD to defeat IEDs used by anyone, anywhere in the world.72 Logically, if the U.S. was engaged in a war against terror where a key weapon of the terrorists were VBIEDs, then XKeyScore would have been formatted by the NSA to identify search-string queries, emails, webpages, texts, messages, IP addresses, online purchase transactions, travel reservations, telephone calls, and social media postings that carry key words and phrases related to building VBIEDs. It also stands to reason that XKeyScore would have been used to automatically analyze the data collected in the PRISM program to identify persons attempting to build or assemble VBIEDs - like Anders Breivik in Norway. And, these automated systems would then send appropriate electronic communications to authorized individuals (such as NCTC analysts) who needed to know about someone attempting to assemble a VBIED. As noted above, NCTC had the authority to direct NSA collection and dissemination of critical intelligence. Snowden's disclosures also revealed the NSA had 100 percent coverage of all Internet traffic in Norway by 2008.73 Therefore all of Breivik's online activity (searching for VBIED recipes, purchasing precursor chemicals, etc.) SHOULD HAVE BEEN collected and analyzed by XKeyScore, and sent to the appropriate U.S. Intelligence authorities. According to John 0. Brennan, NCTC was the "... someplace in the government where all counterterrorism information would reside... "74 Logically, the NSA's PRISM/XKeyScore system relayed the information about Breivik building a car bomb to attack a NATO ally to the NCTC. ________________________________________ 72 https://www. theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/31/nsa-top-secret-program-online-data 73 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/jul/31/nsa-top-secret-proqram-online-data Snowden also revealed that Google, Inc. began participating in the PRISM program in the same year that the NSA achieved 100 percent coverage of Internet activity in Norway - 2008.75 According to Breivik's manifesto he was still conducting historical research about the interaction between Islam and Europe in 2008. It was not until 2-years later (2010), well into the establishment of the PRISM and XKeyScore SIGINT programs on the NSA's Norway data collection, and over 5-years after the DOD's high priority IED defeat efforts, when Breivik began seriously researching how to build a VBIED - using only the Google search engine for this purpose. Post-publication modification of Breivik's manifesto/diary Further open source confirmation of the Obama Administration involvement in a cover-up of advanced knowledge of the Breivik attack is revealed through the manipulation of those versions of Breivik's diary/manifesto that are still available online. The first instance is found in Breivik's diary where he reported conducting a two-week marathon of bomb-making-Google-searches in September 2010.76 All currently available online versions of Breivik's diary/manifesto reviewed by the author have been altered to obscure that date. Some versions have the date changed to October 2010, and some versions remove any date for his online, bomb-making, research-marathon altogether. Why modify this date and not any of the other information - like accurate recipes of how to make other weapons of mass destruction? The September 2010 date is important because it was the first verifiable marker that appeared to initiate the Obama Cabinet musical chairs activity. It was when Breivik noted in his computer diary that he completed his research-marathon that then Secretary of Defense Robert Gates announced he would retire in the next year, but Secretary Gates stated he didn't know exactly when he would retire.[reference needed] Gates retirement was necessary to insulate him from any blame when Breivik struck. Gates would be out of office, and other Cabinet members could move around as well. Then Director CIA Leon Panetta would become the new Secretary of Defense post and would not be held accountable for an "intelligence failure" by the public. The second post-publication modification to Breivik's manifesto/diary were edits of Breivik's entry related to his 60-day countdown to his attacks.77 When Breivik noted in his computer diary that he began his 60-day countdown that day, then Secretary of Defense Gates announced he would be retiring in 30-days. {reference needed] This announcement kicked of a waterfall of Obama Cabinet-level moves. Leon Panetta to Secretary of Defense from CIA, General David Petraeus to CIA, and then the completely unprecedented extension of FBI Director Mueller's tenure for two additional years. This last change of the FBI Director's term required a new federal law. The scramble set off by Breivik's announcement enabled the Obama Administration to obtain the new law in only 3-days, from initiation to signing. These precipitous moves by the Obama Administration simply confirmed the connection with Breivik's preparations. __________________________________________ 74 https://www.cia.gov/library/readinqroom/docs/DOC 0005618307. pdf 75  https://theintercept.com/2015/07/01/nsas-google-worlds-private-communications/ 76 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence, by Andrew Berwick 77 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence. by Andrew Berwick It is important to note that Breivik's 60-day countdown notation was not announced publically - he simply noted it on his computer. For Secretary Gates to be aware of this private notation it would mean Breivik's computer was penetrated by a key logger program implanted by an intelligence service - just the sort of exploit we find the CIA had in Wikileaks Vault 7 materials.78 In the currently available Breivik manifesto/diary, the 60-day countdown reference has been removed and a new countdown added that does not correlate with Breivik's actions, and doesn't follow his style of writing.79 This new countdown was inserted to prevent any correlation with Secretary Gates' retirement announcements. Secondarily, the new countdown can be used to protect Brennan as well. John Brennan meeting history in relation to Breivik's 60-day countdown In the original Breivik manifesto/diary, Breivik noted the day he began his 60-day countdown, but not the actual date of his planned attack. Breivik did not write, "...today I began my 60-day countdown to my attack on July 22...'' By not mentioned the actual date of his planned attack Breivik a reader of the key logger capture could not say with certainty the date of the planned attack - he could only say it will be on one of two days - July 21 or Jul 22. Did the attack date fall on exactly 60-days hence, or did it fall on the day after the 60-day clock? This ambiguity is important in relation to Brennan and a series of meetings he held in the run-up to the Norway attacks and then during their aftermath. The number of meetings of the total documented by the White House which can be tied to a specific event in the Breivik saga indicates the meetings are related Breivik's activity. The record of those meetings follow: Michael Jones, tentatively identified as a State Department Diplomatic Security Agent, who began his USDS tenure as an Intelligence Analyst, made an appointment, or visited, with John 0. Brennan in the White House on the following dates: Date Possible Significance July 20, 2011 - Jones made two calls to White House for two appointment to meet with Brennan on July 21. July 21, 2011- Jones met with Brennan in the State Place DR at 1300 ET and then at 1430 ET.  Jones then made two calls to White House for two appointments with Brennan on July 22, the first for 1330 ET and the second for 1530 ET. ___________________________________ 78  https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/hacking-of-america/wikileaks-mystery-how-were-cia-hacking-tools-stolen-n730921 79 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence. by Andrew Berwick July 22, 2011 - At 0726 ET Breivik detonates VBIED and at approximately 0900 ET begins his shooting attacks. Jones met with Brennan in the State Place DR at 1330 ET and 1530 ET. Jul 26, 2011 Michael Clapper, brother of James Clapper, DNI, receives notice from the author that US Intelligence may have known of Breivik's plans prior to the attack and is asked to forward the notice to DNI Clapper.80 July 27, 2011 FBI received a Tip online that US Intelligence knew of Breivik's plan 6-months in advance.81 ALL US-domiciled News Media outlets CEASED independent reporting on the Norway attacks. Only POTUS can order this cessation.  Jones met with Brennan at 1400 ET in the State Place DR. Jones met with Brennan at 1530 ET in the State Place DR. Jul 28, 2011 John Donovan is confronted by Terry Gudaitis, VP, Cyveillance, Inc. about sending a Tip to the FBI the previous day.82 John Donovan is notified he will be fired.83 July 29, 2011 Michael Jones met with Brennan at 1100 ET in State Place DR.  Michael Jones met with Brennan at 1230 ET in State Place DR. Aug 26, 2011 Michael Jones met with Brennan at 1330 ET in the State Place DR.  This date marks completion of 13 separate forensic psychology interviews of Breivik, which began on Aug 10.84 Apr 12, 2012 - Michael Jones made appointment to meet with Brennan at 1330 ET at State Place DR. Apr 13, 2012 -  Friday prior to Monday, 4/16/2012, the day Breivik's trial began in Norway.  Michael Jones met with Brennan at 1330 ET in State Place DR Jun 22, 2012 -  Breivik's trial in Norway ends. Jun 25, 2012 - Michael Jones made appointment to tour the White House Residence on Jul 10, 2012. Jul 10,2012 - Michael Jones participates in Tour of Residence (were any photos taken of Mr. Jones in the Residence?) Sep 10, 2012 - Michael Jones made appointment to meet Brennan in State Place DR at 1230 ET. Sep 11, 2012 - Dzhokhar Tsarnaev naturalization ceremony.  Michael Jones met with Brennan in State Place DR at 1230 ET. Dec 6, 2012 - Michael Jones made appointment to meet Brennan at 0800 ET on Dec 7, 2012 in State Place DR Dec 7, 2012 - Michael Jones met with Brennan at 0800 ET in State Place DR. The ambiguity of Breivik's 60-day countdown note is confirmed in Michael Jones initial meetings with Brennan. Someone receiving keylogger data from Breivik's computer could not be sure of the exact date of his planned attack based on the 60-day countdown notation. This could explain why Jones arranged to meet Brennan so many times in the July 21 & Jul 22 time frame. ______________________________________ 80 John K. Donovan, personal recollection 81 John K. Donovan, personal recollection 82 John K. Donovan, personal recollection 83 John K. Donovan, personal recollection 84 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3619172/#b4 Coordinated Manipulation of Breivik's manifesto/diary post publication The coordinated manipulation of a few lines of text in the contents of a 1,500 page pdf file, hosted on multiple personal computers, located in different countries around the world, without the knowledge of the owners of the targetted personal computers, is a hacking technique specifically disclosed in Snowden's NSA material. This hacking technique was also disclosed in the Wikileaks Vault 7 reporting of CIA hacking tools.85 The level of sophistication required to ensure complete coverage of all personal computers that were either sent, or downloaded, the Breivik diary/manifesto is enormous. The editing effort couldn't just focus on the 1,000 computers that initially received Breivik's manifesto/diary. The intelligence agency "editors" had to track each and every computer that viewed, emailed, or downloaded the diary/manifesto. Only a State-level entity could assemble the personnel and tools necessary just to sift through hundreds of millions of personal computers to identify which computers downloaded the file. And only a State-level entity would have the specialized resources to then edit a few lines in a 1,500-page file on each of those computers without leaving footprints. Only a government sponsored intelligence agency such as the NSA or the CIA can perform such a herculean task. The required hacking capabilities for such a huge operation are only available to well-funded, State-level intelligence agencies. Under U.S. law only the NSA is authorized to carry out such activities - no other U. S. entity is legally allowed to conduct such widespread computer penetration operations; neither in the U.S. or overseas [emphasis addecfj.66 87 However, as noted above, there was a second "State-level actor" in the U.S. who illegally developed and used technical capabilities only the NSA is authorized to have.88 This second "State-level actor", the CIA89, had extremely close ties with John 0. Brennan, Obama's NSA/CT when Breivik struck against our ally Norway. And Brennan was a frequent participant in Cabinet meetings with the very Cabinet members who apparently felt a need to move from their current post in correlation with Breivik's preparations for his attack. Brennan was made Director of this second state actor by President Obama, the very person in the U.S. government who needed this particular manifesto/diary file edited throughout the world. ____________________________________ 85 https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/hacking-of-america/wikileaks-mystery-how-were-cia-hacking-tools-stolen-n730921 86 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of I 978 (FISA) 87 https://www.archives.gov/federal-reqister/codification/executive-order/12333.html, "... No other department or agency may engage in signals intelligence activities except pursuant to a delegation by the Secretary of Defense... " 88 https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/hacking-of-america/wikileaks-mystery-how-were-cia-hacking-tools-stolen-n730921 89 https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/hacking-of-america/wikileaks-mystery-how-were-cia-hacking-tools-stolen-n730921 Only the NSA has legal authority to conduct the electronic intercept and widespread computer hacking function of the U.S. Intelligence Community. 90 91 We now know that the CIA developed its own capability contrary to the laws of the United States.92 Logically, the CIA had the ability to carry out the worldwide, Breivik diary/manifesto suppression operation, covering thousands of personal computers throughout the world.93 94 Only the Obama Administration had the motivation to task the CIA to undertake such a cover-up. Background related to Breivik's attacks: In .the hours prior to his attacks, Breivik merged his 'attack-preparation-diary-file' with his 'm1anifesto-file' into one file entitled: 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence, by Andrew Berwick. Breivik then sent this manifesto/diary to over 1,000 email addresses around the world. Breivik's diary revealed his exclusive use of the Google search engine to find information and instructions on how to build the VBIED he used against the Norwegian Prime Minister's office (killing 8).95 Breivik's diary also revealed his exclusive use of the Google search engine to plan his mass shooting attack on Utoya Island (killing 69). It is important to rer,ember, Breivik was targeting the Head of State and the ruling political party of Norway with these attacks - these were attacks on the government of Norway, a NATO member, during a time of war.96 A careful review of Breivik's manifesto yields the inescapable conclusion that his exclusive reliance on the Google search engine to research the details of, learn how to build, and then to pl!Jrchase the components of the VBIED he used against the Norwegian government, should have been captured, and analyzed, by the NSA's PRISM and XKeyScore programs. The question is who did the PRISM/XKeyScore system notify of Breivik's online activity? Breivik's concern about Intelligence Service online "Honey Pots" The diary portion of the manifesto revealed Breivik's great concern about operational security (OPSEC) vis-a-vis intelligence service monitoring of the online environment. 97 98 Breivik's OPSEC concerns did not match his OPSEC practices. Breivik ordered all of his bomb making materials online, in true name, using his home address for delivery, and paying for the items with his personal credit card. Breivik's manifesto/diary entries also indicate he downloaded approximately 100 guides, manuals, or books, on how to build an IED from various terrorism related websites. 99 Breivik recorded his concern that at least some of these terrorism websites were intelligence service "honey pots" and that he thought he would be monitored after accessing them. ________________________________________ 90 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) 91 https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/codification/executive-order/12333.html, "...No other department or agency may engage in signals intelligence activities except pursuant to a delegation by the Secretary of Defense... 92  https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/hacking-of-america/wikileaks-mystery-how-were-cia-hacking-tools-stolen-n730921 93 https://www.wired.com/2017/03/cia-can-hack-phone-pc-tv-says-wikileaks/ 94https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/hacking-of-america/wikileaks-mystery-how-were-cia-hacking-tools-stolen-n730921 95 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence, bv Andrew Berwick 96 Norwegian Foreign Minister Jonas Gahr Stoere. USAToday reports that, Steere "... called Breiviks's actions a deliberate attack on the Norwegian government and a new generation of Norwegian politicians... Breivik intended to spread fear and panic, Steere said. 'We will not let that happen... The attack in Oslo will not change our politics, values and the way we engage internationally... " ; source: https://archive.org/stream/PODESTA4/PODESTA%204_djvu.txt 97 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence bv Andrew Berwick. 98 https://edwardsnowden.com/2015/08/12/targets-visitinq-specific-websites/ 99 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence, by Andrew Berwick. It is extremely likely NSA internet SIGINT programs (such as PRISM) were monitoring at least some of these terrorism sites to capture the IP addresses of the computers that accessed such sites.100 It is extremely likely that a program like PRISM recorded which IP addresses downloaded the bomb assembly guides found on the terrorism website (in order to identify any potential terrorists). Other terrorism investigations reveal the investigative technique of monitoring a specific site (honey pot), or email account, is used by U.S. Intelligence. One such example relates to the many terrorism cases linked to Anwar AI-Awlaki, an American cleric who was a key influencer of various Al-Qaeda terrorists from before 9-11, through the Major Nidal Hassan shootings at Ft. Hood in 2009, the Christmas Bombing attempt of Northwest Flight 253, and the attempted bombing of civilian cargo aircraft in 2011. All of the terrorists involved had watched or listened to AI-Awlaki's sermons online. No doubt, PRISM and XKeyScore monitored those who accessed AI-Awlaki's webpages by using his webpages as "honey pots" and sent out the appropriate notifications.101 The question is who did the PRISM/XKeyScore system notify about the persons accessing AI-Awlaki's webpages over all those years?102 Breivik's online activity to assemble and build his VBIED Breivik recorded spending 200-hours during a two week period in September 2010 entering search strings related to assembling a VBIED from scratch.103 Breivik was a complete novice bomb builder with no prior training in bomb making.104 As noted above, all of Breivik's searches for bomb making instructions and recipes should have been captured, analyzed, and appropriate notifications sent out by the NSA's PRISM and XKeyScore programs. If one isolates the VBIED related search terms revealed in Breivik's manifesto for: chemicals, components, suppliers, recipes, designs, and suitable targets, for a VBIED attack; and then places those terms in a single column, these keywords stretch for 38 single-spaced pages.105 One can imagine XKeyScore overlooking one, two, or even a dozen, surreptitious searches for bomb making instructions in the vast sea of internet data. Or, one might believe someone conducting a day or two of searches for bomb related information due to adolescent curiosity. Breivik's online, bomb-making, research activity works out to be 16-hours per day for 14-days straight from one IP address in Norway!106 And then, the same IP address in Norway was used to order the pre-cursor chemicals for bomb making online, using the owner's true name, his valid delivery and billing address, and his personal credit card online.107 Breivik even mentioned his fear that his online purchases would place him on a watch list with intelligence services.108 __________________________________ 100  https://edwardsnowden.com/2015/08/12/targets-visiting-specific-websites/ 101  https://edwardsnowden.com/2015/08/12/targets-visiting-specific-websites/ 102  https://edwardsnowden.com/2015/08/12/targets-visiting-specific-websites/ 103 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence. by Andrew Berwick. 104 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence. by Andrew Berwick. 105 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence. by Andrew Berwick. 106 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence, by Andrew Berwick. 107 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence. by Andrew Berwick. 108 2083 - A European Declaration of Independence. by Andrew Berwick. Given the foregoing information, one must conclude Breivik's online activity was, in fact, collected by the NSA's PRISM program, and that the search terms he used were recognized as significant in the XKeyScore program. Logic indicates the NSA had collected an overwhelming amount of information about someone in Norway building a VBIED; including the bomb maker's name, home address, IP address, and credit card information. The question is which US Intelligence entity requested the NSA provide updates on Breivik's online activities or actions? The record shows Obama's Cabinet Secretaries reacted to the information on Breivik's computer prior to Brievik's attack. Breivik's success indicates Norway was not warned of the impending attack. Example #3: The second time the author realized there was someone in our Intelligence Community who was actually allowing terror attacks against the United States, and our allies, was following the April 2013 Boston Marathon Bombing. The "disconnect" between the author's experience as an FBI Special Agent and what was reportedly done to investigate Tsarnaev prior to the attack was tob jarring for him to ignore . T h e author was aware of a special computer program for tracking the international travel of an intelligence officer or terrorist that had been in use for decades. The program is called Fuzzy Finder.109 It was apparent to the author that someone in U.S. Intelligence must have withheld key information about Tsarnaev's travel and activities in Russia from the FBI; which allowed th e Boston Marathon Bombing to succeed. As noted above, all Russian FSB Counterterrorism communications to the FBI and the CIA were available to the NCTC as soon as the communications entered FBI and CIA databases - there was no need to "forward" the communications to NCTC. The NCTC could then use that information to place compartmentalization requests with the NSA for all SIGINT regarding T s arnaev - this would explain why the FBI agent did not see examples of Tsarnaev's email communications with known terrorists in Russia, records related to his purchasing tickets to fly to Russia, recordings of telephone calls of Tsarnaev with his mother, travel information about his return travel, etc., when the case agent was conducting his Guardian review. T he record shows this CIA officer had no prior relationship with the targeted FSB officer and the pitch was doomed to fail.112 Only the Director CIA (then Brennan) can authorize a pitch in a denied area like Moscow. To all appearances it looks as if this recruitment attempt was set up to fail from the beginning... ____________________________________ 109  https://www.chron.com/news/article/PRN-The-Analysis-Corporation-and-lnfoglide-1859462.php 110  https://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-spy-agency-claims-cia-agent-arrested-for-tryinq-to-recruit-russian-agent-in-moscow/ 111 https://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/15/world/europe/russia-detains-american-sayinq-he-is-cia-aqent.html 112 https://www.washinqtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2013/05/14/heres-the-spy-recruitment-letter-alleqedly-found-on-cia-agent-in-moscowl?noredirect=on&utm term=.e2c8dbd804a5 Is there a reason Director CIA Brennan would want the recruitment of a Russian Intelligence Officer to fail? When an Intelligence Officer from a rather closed society like Russia is pitched by the "opposition", it is a pretty standard response that the "pitched" officer is prohibited frem travelling outside Russia. Historically, Russian Intelligence have viewed recruitment targets in their ranks as someone who is 'vulnerable' and they don't want to expose the officer to future recruitment efforts. Russian Intelligence Services have historically prevented a vulnerable officer from travelling overseas to protect their Intelligence Officer from having contact with the "opposition" again. Understanding how the opposition will institutionally react to a particular action enables one to use that reaction for a particular purpose. It is not beyond the realm of possibility that CIA Director Brennan approved the "cold pitch" in order to "quarantine" the FSB Officer from travelling to the U.S. to help in the Tsarnaev investigation. The fact this "cold pitch" blew the cover of a young CIA Case Officer was probably viewed as collateral damage. The common denominator in all these instances was John 0. Brennan's personal involvement. Based on that common denominator, the author took a deep dive into the publically available information. The result is the allegation Brennan, and un-named others, were using the NCTC to maintain a "CT Intel Info-monopoly" so they could "front run" events and pick and choose which terrorists would succeed against the U.S. in order to boost their investment portfolios. It was only in 2019 the author discovered Brennan's hidden ownership in TAC, and its successor companies. By allowing Americans and our allies to be maimed and murdered, Brennan was able to increase the value of his investments. The author realizes these allegations are very serious - failure to protect a NATO ally in a time of war is treason, and punishable by death. Profiting from intentionally allowing the death and injury of innocents is simply... disgusting. Conclusion: The preponderance of the evidence proves: 1) Brennan, and others unknown, set up a "CT Intel Info-monopoly' in the form of the NCTC that relied on an indispensable government contractor. 2) Brennan retired from US Government service to become the President and CEO of the indispensable government contractor, 3) Brennan arranged the sale of the indispensable government contractor to an investor so that the indispensable government contractor could be spun off in an Initial Public Offering (IPO); Brennan got stock in the indispensable government contractor. 4) The "CT Intel Info-monopoly" logically enabled Brennan, and others unknown at the indispensable government contractor, to have advanced knowledge of at least two pending terror attacks, and this advanced knowledge was withheld from appropriate U.S. Intelligence authorities. 5) The information withheld by the "CT Intel Info-monopoly'' resulted in successful attacks on U.S. and allied nation citizens. 6) The successful attacks induced the U.S. Government to spend billions of dollars in excess funds to prevent similar attacks in the future. 7) The additional spending resulted in at least $2.2 billion in funding to the indispensable government contractor. 8) Brennan filed four false official statements in the form of Financial Disclosure forms that hid his proprietary ownership of the indispensable government contractor in violation of Conflict of Interest laws. 9) Brennan was able to increase the value of his proprietary ownership in the indispensable government contractor from approximately $150,000 to $2,100,000 in November 25, 2009; and then increased the $2,100,000 to $4,850,000 on April 4, 2011 as the result of his hidden ownership.113 Brennan,  et al, set up a Counterterrorism Intelligence Information Monopoly (CT Intel Info-Monopoly) to hide critical national intelligence from our Republic.  Resting on the foundation of an indispensable government contractor,  originally known as The Analysis Corporation, used the worldwide reach of the NSA to identify a seemingly suitable terror-candidate (actor) they would allow to succeed - then, again, they used this CT Intel Info-Monopoly to prevent any other Intelligence or Law Enforcement Agency from gathering enough facts to stop the terror-candidate. Logically, they would have to have a few terror-candidates in the queue because some cop on the street may just stumble upon any particular terror-candidate during the terror-candidate's preparatory activity.  The well engineering and organized criminal scheme cost American and NATO lives, while Mr. Brennan, and presumably other, enriched themselves financially. We The People must hold this criminal activity within our government accountable immediately. _________________________________ 113 https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edqar/data/1471038/000095012311032487/c15093sv8pos. htm END LETTER